2001 Ford Laser vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2001 Ford Laser is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2001 Ford Laser. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Laser weights approximately 120 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena.
Because 1982 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Laser | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Laser | Murena |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 116 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1115 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2440 mm |
