2001 Ford Mondeo vs. 1958 Jaguar MK IX
To start off, 2001 Ford Mondeo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jaguar MK IX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jaguar MK IX would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jaguar MK IX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Jaguar MK IX (217 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2001 Ford Mondeo. (144 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Jaguar MK IX should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Mondeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jaguar MK IX weights approximately 507 kg more than 2001 Ford Mondeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Jaguar MK IX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Jaguar MK IX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jaguar MK IX (330 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Mondeo. (190 Nm). This means 1958 Jaguar MK IX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Mondeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Mondeo | 1958 Jaguar MK IX | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Mondeo | MK IX |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 144 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 87.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.1 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2900 mm |
