2001 Ford Mondeo vs. 1963 Riley 4
To start off, 2001 Ford Mondeo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Riley 4 would be higher. At 1,981 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mondeo (122 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1963 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1963 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 262 kg more than 1963 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Riley 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Riley 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mondeo (183 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Riley 4. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Mondeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Mondeo | 1963 Riley 4 | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Mondeo | 4 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1981 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 45 L |