2001 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Morgan 4
To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mustang weights approximately 638 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Mustang | 1963 Morgan 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Morgan |
| Model | Mustang | 4 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1340 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2450 mm |
