2001 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Seat 600

To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mustang weights approximately 723 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mustang (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: