2001 Ford Mustang vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mustang weights approximately 428 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mustang (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Mustang | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | Herald |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 69.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 29 L |