2001 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mustang weights approximately 158 kg more than 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Mustang | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Mustang | Tiger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 4259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 27 L |