2001 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Mini MK I

To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mustang weights approximately 683 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mustang (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I. 2001 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1967 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1967 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: