2001 Ford Mustang vs. 1992 Mazda Eunos
To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda Eunos would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda Eunos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mustang weights approximately 68 kg more than 1992 Mazda Eunos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mazda Eunos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mustang (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (167 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda Eunos.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Mustang | 1992 Mazda Eunos | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | Eunos |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |