2001 Ford Mustang vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (265 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1045 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Mustang | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Westfield |
| Model | Mustang | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 4599 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2320 mm |
