2001 Ford Puma vs. 1965 Maserati Tipo 65
To start off, 2001 Ford Puma is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Maserati Tipo 65. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 would be higher. At 5,046 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 (424 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 2001 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Puma weights approximately 75 kg more than 1965 Maserati Tipo 65.
Because 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Maserati Tipo 65. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Puma | 1965 Maserati Tipo 65 | |
| Make | Ford | Maserati |
| Model | Puma | Tipo 65 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1560 cc | 5046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 424 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |
