2001 Ford Puma vs. 1980 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2001 Ford Puma is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Puma weights approximately 85 kg more than 1980 Opel Ascona.
Because 1980 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Puma | 1980 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Puma | Ascona |
Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2530 mm |