2001 Ford Puma vs. 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis

To start off, 2001 Ford Puma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2001 Ford Puma. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 680 kg more than 2001 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Puma 1996 Mercury Grand Marquis
Make Ford Mercury
Model Puma Grand Marquis
Year Released 2001 1996
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1560 cc 4600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 99 HP 208 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1035 kg 1715 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 5400 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1980 mm