2001 Ford Puma vs. 2000 Skoda Fabia

To start off, 2001 Ford Puma is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Skoda Fabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Skoda Fabia would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 99 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 35 kg more than 2001 Ford Puma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Skoda Fabia. (126 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Skoda Fabia.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Puma 2000 Skoda Fabia
Make Ford Skoda
Model Puma Fabia
Year Released 2001 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1560 cc 1388 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 99 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 75.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1035 kg 1070 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 3970 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 45 L