2001 Ford Puma vs. 2000 Tata Indica
To start off, 2001 Ford Puma is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata Indica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata Indica would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2000 Tata Indica. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Puma weights approximately 105 kg more than 2000 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata Indica. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Puma | 2000 Tata Indica | |
Make | Ford | Tata |
Model | Puma | Indica |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1404 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2410 mm |