2001 Ford Puma vs. 2004 Suzuki Swift

To start off, 2004 Suzuki Swift is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Puma would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Puma (99 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Swift. (52 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Puma weights approximately 295 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Puma (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Swift. (76 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Swift.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Puma 2004 Suzuki Swift
Make Ford Suzuki
Model Puma Swift
Year Released 2001 2004
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1560 cc 993 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 99 HP 52 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 76 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1035 kg 740 kg
Vehicle Length 3990 mm 3850 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2270 mm