2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1959 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Ranger | 1959 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2970 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
