2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1959 Ford 17M
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford 17M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford 17M would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 725 kg more than 1959 Ford 17M.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford 17M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 1959 Ford 17M | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | 17M |
Year Released | 2001 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 1697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2610 mm |