2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1959 Triumph TR3
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1959 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 835 kg more than 1959 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Triumph TR3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 1959 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Ranger | TR3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1959 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 29 L |