2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 MG MGC
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG MGC (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Ranger (203 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGC. (174 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Ranger | 1964 MG MGC | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | Ranger | MGC |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
