2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 450 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Ranger | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |
