2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 240 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Ranger | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Ranger | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2760 mm |
