2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1986 Mazda 626
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 708 kg more than 1986 Mazda 626.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 1986 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 626 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2970 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 117 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1082 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2520 mm |