2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1992 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,970 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 188 kg more than 1992 Toyota 4Runner.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 1992 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Ranger | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2970 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1602 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2630 mm |