2001 Ford Ranger vs. 1996 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 325 kg more than 1996 Ford Aerostar.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 1996 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3030 mm |