2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 375 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z3 (210 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ranger. (203 Nm). This means 2002 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Ranger | Z3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 210 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2450 mm |