2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Ford Tonka
To start off, 2002 Ford Tonka is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Tonka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 488 kg more than 2002 Ford Tonka.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Ford Tonka has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Ford Tonka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Ranger | 2002 Ford Tonka | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | Tonka |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2970 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1302 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 6150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 4200 mm |
