2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Opel Omega.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (300 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ranger. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Ranger | Omega |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 300 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2740 mm |