2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2002 Opel Omega

To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Opel Omega (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Opel Omega.

Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Opel Omega (300 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ranger. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Ford Ranger 2002 Opel Omega
Make Ford Opel
Model Ranger Omega
Year Released 2001 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2300 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 128 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 300 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1720 kg 1660 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 3010 mm 2740 mm