2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Ranger | 6 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |