2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Nissan M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ranger. (203 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ranger. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 2006 Nissan M | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Ranger | M |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 462 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |