2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 160 kg more than 2010 Cadillac BLS.

Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac BLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac BLS (350 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ranger. (203 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ranger. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: