2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. Both 2001 Ford Ranger and 2010 Ford Ranger are equipped with a 2,300 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 273 kg more than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ranger. (203 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 209 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1447 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3193 mm |