2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 510 kg more than 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Ranger | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Ford | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Ranger | CCXR |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2970 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 1064 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2660 mm |
