2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Audi RS5
To start off, 2012 Audi RS5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS5 (354 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS5 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi RS5 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2001 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS5 (440 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ranger. (203 Nm). This means 2012 Audi RS5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Ranger | 2012 Audi RS5 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Ranger | RS5 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 4200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 354 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 440 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4625 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1854 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2751 mm |
