2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Ranger (128 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Ranger (203 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (155 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Ranger | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Ranger | Aveo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 113 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2525 mm |
