2001 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 81 kg more than 2013 Jeep Wrangler.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Ranger | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Ranger | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4000 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1840 kg | 1759 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2423 mm |