2001 Ford Taurus vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 2001 Ford Taurus is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,961 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Taurus (201 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Taurus weights approximately 371 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Taurus (250 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: