2001 Ford TE-50 vs. 1954 Saab 92B
To start off, 2001 Ford TE-50 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Saab 92B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Saab 92B would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford TE-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford TE-50 weights approximately 881 kg more than 1954 Saab 92B.
Because 2001 Ford TE-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford TE-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Saab 92B, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford TE-50 | 1954 Saab 92B | |
| Make | Ford | Saab |
| Model | TE-50 | 92B |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1954 |
| Engine Size | 4940 cc | 764 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1666 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2480 mm |
