2001 Ford TE-50 vs. 1998 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2001 Ford TE-50 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford TE-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford TE-50 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1998 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford TE-50 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercury Villager weights approximately 134 kg more than 2001 Ford TE-50.
Because 2001 Ford TE-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford TE-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford TE-50 | 1998 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | TE-50 | Villager |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1666 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |