2001 Ford TE-50 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford TE-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford TE-50 would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford TE-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford TE-50 weights approximately 215 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2001 Ford TE-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford TE-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford TE-50 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | TE-50 | C30 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1666 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |