2001 Ford Think vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2001 Ford Think is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Think (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Think should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Think weights approximately 74 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Think, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Think (183 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Think will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Think | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Think | EJ |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 163 Nm |
Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1134 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |