2001 Ford Think vs. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2001 Ford Think is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 892 kg more than 2001 Ford Think.
Because 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Think, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Think | 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Think | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 2100 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3130 mm |
