2001 Ford Think vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Think. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Think would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Ford Think. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Think. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2001 Ford Think. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (228 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Think. (183 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Think.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Think | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Think | 3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 228 Nm |
Fuel Type | Electric | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1383 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2639 mm |