2001 Ford Think vs. 2013 Mazda 3

To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Think. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Think would be higher. At 2,489 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2001 Ford Think. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Think. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda 3 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2001 Ford Think. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda 3 (228 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Think. (183 Nm). This means 2013 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Think. 2001 Ford Think has automatic transmission and 2013 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2013 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Think will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: