2001 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2001 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Thunderbird (249 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 975 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Thunderbird | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Ford | Zastava |
| Model | Thunderbird | 102 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 249 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2160 mm |
