2001 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2001 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Thunderbird (249 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 160 kg more than 2001 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Thunderbird | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Thunderbird | SSU |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3933 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 249 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 71 L |
