2001 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,933 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Thunderbird (249 HP) has 106 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2001 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Thunderbird | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3933 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 249 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |