2001 Ford Urban Explorer vs. 1996 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercury Villager weights approximately 31 kg more than 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercury Villager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Urban Explorer | 1996 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | Urban Explorer | Villager |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2860 mm |
