2001 Ford Urban Explorer vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Urban Explorer would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2009 Renault Megane. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Megane.
Because 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer (380 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Megane. (152 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Urban Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Urban Explorer | 2009 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Urban Explorer | Megane |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |
