2001 Ford Urban Explorer vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Urban Explorer would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2001 Ford Urban Explorer. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Urban Explorer.
Because 2001 Ford Urban Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Urban Explorer (380 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ranger. (322 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Urban Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Ford Urban Explorer | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Urban Explorer | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3193 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 74 L |
